Evaluating Volume Based Payment Models

Evaluating Volume Based Payment Models

Overview of typical electronic devices and their functions

In recent years, the burgeoning issue of electronic waste, often referred to as e-waste, has become a critical concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike. Local businesses appreciate their commitment to recycling removal furniture futon. As technology continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, the lifespan of electronic products shortens, leading to an exponential increase in discarded devices. This rise in e-waste necessitates effective processing practices to mitigate its environmental impact and recover valuable materials. One promising approach to enhancing these practices is the adoption of volume-based payment models, which align economic incentives with sustainable waste management.


E-waste processing involves several stages, including collection, sorting, dismantling, and recycling. Each stage presents unique challenges and opportunities for improvement. Traditionally, e-waste processors have been compensated based on weight; however, this method may not accurately reflect the true value and complexity of processing various types of electronics. A shift towards volume-based payment models could encourage more efficient handling by rewarding processors for optimizing space utilization during transportation and storage.


Volume-based payment models can drive innovation in e-waste logistics. By incentivizing reduced bulkiness rather than weight alone, these models encourage the development of compacting technologies that minimize the spatial footprint of discarded electronics. This not only lowers transportation costs but also reduces greenhouse gas emissions associated with moving large volumes over long distances.


Moreover, volume-based systems can promote better sorting practices at the source-households and businesses that generate e-waste. When disposal costs are tied to volume rather than weight, stakeholders are motivated to disassemble items into components or flatten them before discarding. Such behaviors facilitate easier identification and separation of valuable materials like precious metals or rare earth elements during subsequent recycling processes.


However, transitioning to volume-based payment models requires careful consideration of potential drawbacks. There is a risk that focusing solely on volume might overlook other important factors such as hazardous material content or recyclability rates-key considerations when evaluating overall environmental impact. Therefore, these models should be designed with flexibility in mind, allowing adjustments based on additional criteria beyond mere size reduction.


Furthermore, implementing volume-based payment systems necessitates collaboration across multiple sectors involved in e-waste management-from manufacturers designing products with end-of-life disposal in mind to governments enforcing regulations that support sustainable practices throughout product lifecycles.


In conclusion, while current e-waste processing practices face significant challenges due largely to outdated compensation structures centered around weight measurements alone; adopting innovative approaches like volume-based payment models holds promise for more effective solutions moving forward. By redefining how we evaluate success within this industry through metrics aligned with sustainability goals rather than purely economic ones-we open up new possibilities not just technologically but also environmentally-and ultimately pave our way towards greener futures where both people planet prosper together alike!



Evaluating Volume Based Payment Models - foam

  1. cost
  2. box
  3. Appliance recycling

In recent years, the growing concern over electronic waste (e-waste) has prompted a reevaluation of waste management systems worldwide. One innovative approach that has garnered attention is the implementation of volume-based payment models for e-waste management. This model offers several distinct advantages that make it an appealing solution for effectively addressing the challenges posed by increasing volumes of e-waste.


At its core, a volume-based payment model charges fees based on the amount of e-waste processed or collected. This system inherently incentivizes both consumers and manufacturers to minimize waste production. By aligning financial incentives with environmental goals, this model encourages stakeholders to adopt more sustainable practices. For example, consumers become more conscious about disposing of electronics only when necessary, while manufacturers are motivated to design products with longer life spans and easier recyclability.


One significant advantage of volume-based payment models is their potential to enhance resource efficiency within e-waste management systems. When organizations are charged according to the volume of e-waste they handle, there is a direct incentive to optimize their processes for greater efficiency. This can lead to innovative recycling techniques and improved logistics in handling e-waste, ultimately reducing costs and enhancing the overall sustainability of the operation.


Moreover, this model promotes accountability and transparency within the industry. By linking payments directly to the volume managed, stakeholders can easily track performance metrics and ensure compliance with environmental standards. It simplifies auditing processes and provides a clear framework for evaluating effectiveness in managing e-waste streams.


Another noteworthy advantage lies in fostering collaboration across different sectors involved in e-waste management. A volume-based approach necessitates cooperation among municipalities, waste management companies, manufacturers, and consumers to achieve common objectives. Such collaboration can lead to shared knowledge and resources that further improve system efficiency and drive innovation in tackling complex issues associated with electronic waste.


Furthermore, this payment model can have significant economic benefits by creating new market opportunities within the recycling industry. As demand for efficient processing increases due to cost implications tied directly with volume handled; businesses specializing in collection services or advanced recycling technologies stand poised at an advantageous position capable not only meeting demands but also driving growth through innovation aimed at improving process efficiencies further still enhancing profitability margins considerably over timeframes considered medium-to-long term oriented investments therein!


In conclusion then: adopting a volume-based payment model represents an advantageous strategy towards achieving sustainable solutions concerning escalating global concerns surrounding ever-increasing volumes generated from discarded electronics annually worldwide today! With its ability incentivize reduction resource consumption whilst promoting accountability transparency ultimately facilitating cross-sector collaborations leading economic benefits-this approach presents compelling case worth consideration policymakers seeking effective methods address critical issue facing our planet now future generations alike!

E-Waste Processing Plants See Record Investments to Meet Rising Demand

 E-Waste Processing Plants See Record Investments to Meet Rising Demand

The growing tide of electronic waste, or e-waste, has become a pressing global challenge as the world continues to advance technologically at an unprecedented pace.. The proliferation of smartphones, laptops, and countless other electronic devices has led to a significant increase in discarded electronics.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Pricing Transparency in Junk Removal Becomes Priority in Regulatory Reforms

 Pricing Transparency in Junk Removal Becomes Priority in Regulatory Reforms

In recent years, the regulatory landscape has increasingly prioritized pricing transparency across various industries.. One particular sector experiencing this shift is junk removal, where pricing transparency has become a focal point in regulatory reforms.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Recycling Rare Earth Metals from E-Waste Becomes Key Focus of Industry Leaders

 Recycling Rare Earth Metals from E-Waste Becomes Key Focus of Industry Leaders

The recycling of rare earth metals from electronic waste (e-waste) is increasingly becoming a focal point for industry leaders, driven by the urgent need for sustainable practices in technology and the growing demand for these critical materials.. As we look to the future, several prospects and potential developments stand out, promising to reshape the way we approach e-waste recycling. One of the most exciting future prospects is the advancement in recycling technologies.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Stages of the Electronic Device Lifecycle

Implementing volume-based payment models in the industry poses a series of challenges and limitations that require careful evaluation. These models, which reward entities based on the quantity of products or services delivered, rather than quality or value, can have far-reaching implications for both providers and consumers.


One primary challenge associated with volume-based payments is the potential misalignment of incentives. When compensation is tied to the amount produced, there can be a tendency to prioritize quantity over quality. This focus may lead to diminished standards in product or service delivery as organizations strive to maximize output at the expense of excellence. For industries where quality is paramount-such as healthcare, manufacturing, and education-this could result in significant negative outcomes. In healthcare, for instance, prioritizing volume could lead to rushed procedures or insufficient patient care, ultimately compromising patient safety and satisfaction.


Moreover, implementing volume-based payment systems often leads to increased operational costs.

Evaluating Volume Based Payment Models - construction

  1. construction
  2. customer
  3. foam
Organizations may need to invest in additional resources such as labor and materials to boost production volumes. This can strain financial resources and potentially reduce profit margins if not managed efficiently. Additionally, maintaining high production levels could necessitate continuous upgrading of technology and infrastructure, further escalating costs.


Another limitation is the risk of market saturation. By focusing solely on increasing output, companies might flood the market with their products or services faster than demand can absorb them. This oversupply could drive prices down and erode profitability-a particularly dangerous scenario for industries with thin margins.


Furthermore, volume-based payment models tend to neglect customer satisfaction metrics. While businesses might succeed in producing large quantities quickly, they risk alienating their consumer base if those offerings do not meet customer expectations or needs. Discontented customers may turn elsewhere if they feel neglected by a company's focus on numbers over meaningful engagement.


Additionally, such models often lack adaptability in dynamic market conditions. In rapidly changing environments where consumer preferences shift frequently or technological advancements occur regularly, being tethered to a rigid framework centered around volume can hinder an organization's ability to pivot effectively when necessary.


Finally, there are ethical considerations inherent in these systems that cannot be ignored: rewarding sheer volume without regard for environmental impact raises serious concerns about sustainability practices within industries already grappling with climate change challenges.


In conclusion, while volume-based payment models offer certain benefits like predictable revenue streams through heightened productivity efforts; they also present numerous challenges ranging from compromised product/service quality due largely because incentive structures prioritize quantity above all else-as well increased operational expenditures due staffing requirements alongside potential issues surrounding ethics (sustainability). Therefore it becomes imperative that stakeholders thoroughly evaluate these implications before adopting such frameworks widely across various sectors so that any adverse effects stemming from misaligned priorities don't outweigh perceived gains achieved via higher outputs alone!

Stages of the Electronic Device Lifecycle

Design and manufacturing processes

In recent years, the escalating issue of electronic waste (e-waste) has emerged as a significant environmental challenge. As technology rapidly evolves, obsolete gadgets and devices accumulate, necessitating efficient and sustainable processing solutions. A promising approach to addressing this problem is the implementation of volume-based payment models in e-waste processing. By examining case studies of successful implementations of these models, we can glean valuable insights into their effectiveness and potential for broader application.


Volume-based payment models are predicated on the concept that recyclers or waste processors are compensated based on the amount of e-waste they handle. This model incentivizes processors to maximize efficiency and throughput while ensuring that more waste is diverted from landfills and channeled into recycling streams. One notable example of this model's success can be observed in Sweden, where a robust regulatory framework supports e-waste processing facilities through volume-based compensation schemes. Here, e-waste collection networks have expanded significantly, leading to higher recycling rates and more environmentally sound disposal practices.


Another compelling case study comes from Japan, where volume-based models have been integrated with advanced sorting technologies to enhance processing capabilities. In Japanese cities like Tokyo and Osaka, e-waste processors have embraced automation to streamline operations and increase processing volumes. The success of these initiatives is reflected in both financial performance and environmental impact metrics. Processors receive payments commensurate with the tonnage processed, motivating them to continually refine methodologies for extracting valuable materials from discarded electronics.


In North America, certain municipalities have experimented with volume-based payment structures within public-private partnership frameworks. For instance, a pilot program in Toronto demonstrated that aligning financial incentives with processing volumes could lead to improved efficiencies across the entire supply chain-from collection points to final material recovery facilities. The program also highlighted the importance of transparency and collaboration between stakeholders to ensure fair compensation and accountability throughout the process.


These case studies underscore several key factors crucial for the successful implementation of volume-based models in e-waste processing. First is the establishment of supportive policies that facilitate market entry for processors while enforcing environmental standards. Second, technological innovation plays a vital role; investments in automated systems can significantly boost throughput capabilities while maintaining quality control over recycled materials.


Additionally, fostering partnerships among government entities, private industry players, and non-governmental organizations can create synergies that drive progress toward sustainability goals. By collaborating effectively across sectors, stakeholders can share best practices and resources to overcome challenges inherent in managing complex waste streams.


In conclusion, evaluating volume-based payment models through real-world examples offers compelling evidence of their potential efficacy in promoting sustainable e-waste management practices worldwide. As global awareness around electronic waste grows alongside technological advancements enabling more efficient recycling processes-these models present an attractive avenue worth exploring further by policymakers seeking innovative solutions tailored towards mitigating this pressing issue responsibly without compromising economic viability along its path forward globally at large scale levels too eventually someday soon enough hopefully indeed!

Usage phase: maintenance and longevity

In the landscape of healthcare and various service industries, the evaluation of volume-based payment models reveals a nuanced impact on diverse stakeholders, particularly processors, consumers, and regulatory bodies. These stakeholders navigate a complex web of interests and outcomes shaped by the incentives inherent in such models.


Processors, often represented by healthcare providers or service deliverers within other industries, find themselves primarily driven by the imperative to maximize output. Volume-based payment models reward these entities based on the quantity of services rendered or goods produced rather than the quality or outcome of these services. This framework can lead to certain efficiencies as processors seek to streamline operations and increase throughput. However, it may also incentivize practices that prioritize quantity over quality, potentially compromising the integrity of services provided. For instance, in healthcare settings, there might be an increase in diagnostic testing or procedures that do not necessarily align with patient needs but serve to augment billing opportunities.


Consumers are directly affected by this model through the quality and cost of services they receive. On one hand, increased competition among processors can lead to improved access and reduced wait times for services as providers vie for greater volumes. Yet, this model may inadvertently lead to overutilization of unnecessary services or procedures that do not enhance consumer well-being but inflate costs. Consumers could face higher out-of-pocket expenses without corresponding improvements in outcomes or satisfaction.


Regulatory bodies play a critical role in overseeing volume-based payment models to ensure they align with public interest goals such as affordability, accessibility, and quality assurance. These organizations must grapple with crafting regulations that curb potential abuses while fostering innovation and efficiency within industries reliant on these payment structures. Regulatory bodies are tasked with maintaining a delicate balance-promoting fair competition and protecting consumers from excessive charges arising from non-essential services.


The evaluation of volume-based payment models thus requires meticulous consideration from all stakeholders involved. Processors must navigate ethical considerations alongside operational goals; consumers need advocacy and protection against exploitative practices; regulatory bodies must anticipate challenges while creating frameworks that support balanced growth and equitable service distribution.


Ultimately, transitioning towards more value-oriented approaches-or hybrid models incorporating both volume and value metrics-could present a viable path forward. Such strategies would encourage sustainable practices where benefits extend across all stakeholders: ensuring fair compensation for processors based on positive outcomes rather than sheer numbers; empowering consumers with high-quality care at reasonable costs; enabling regulators to uphold standards promoting societal welfare effectively.


In sum, evaluating volume-based payment models necessitates an integrated approach acknowledging processor motivations, consumer impacts, and regulatory oversight complexities-all crucial elements shaping their success or failure across varied sectors today.

End-of-Life Management for Electronic Devices

In recent years, the healthcare industry has been undergoing a significant transformation, driven by the need to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve patient outcomes. One area that has garnered considerable attention is volume-based payment models. These models traditionally reward providers based on the quantity of services rendered rather than the quality of care provided. However, as we look toward the future, innovations and technological advancements are poised to reshape these systems in profound ways.


Volume-based payment models have long been criticized for incentivizing higher volumes of services without necessarily improving health outcomes. The result is often an increase in unnecessary procedures and tests, leading to higher healthcare costs without corresponding benefits to patients. Recognizing these shortcomings, there has been a shift towards value-based care models that prioritize patient outcomes over service volume. Nonetheless, volume-based systems still play a crucial role in many healthcare settings, necessitating innovative approaches to make them more effective.


One promising avenue for innovation lies in leveraging data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). By harnessing vast amounts of patient data, AI can help identify patterns and predict which interventions are most likely to be effective for specific populations. This can lead to more targeted care strategies within volume-based systems, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively. For instance, predictive analytics can aid in identifying patients at high risk for certain conditions early on, enabling timely interventions that could prevent costly procedures down the line.


Additionally, telemedicine and digital health technologies offer new opportunities for transforming volume-based payment models. With the rise of remote monitoring devices and virtual consultations, healthcare providers can deliver continuous care without geographic constraints. This not only expands access but also allows for better management of chronic diseases through regular monitoring and timely adjustments in treatment plans. By incorporating these technologies into volume-based systems, it becomes possible to maintain a high service level while focusing on preventative care-potentially reducing overall healthcare costs.


Blockchain technology is another frontier with potential implications for volume-based payment models. Blockchain can provide secure and transparent record-keeping systems that ensure all transactions are accurately recorded and verifiable. This transparency could address issues related to billing fraud or discrepancies between services rendered and payments received-a common concern in traditional volume-based frameworks.


Furthermore, fostering a culture of collaboration among healthcare providers is essential for implementing successful innovations within these payment models. Interdisciplinary teams working together can optimize treatment plans by combining their expertise across different specialties. This approach aligns well with the principles of integrated care delivery systems where every team member's contribution leads towards achieving optimal patient outcomes even within a primarily volume-driven context.


In conclusion, while there are inherent challenges associated with traditional volume-based payment models-primarily due to their focus on quantity over quality-the future holds promising possibilities through technological advancements and innovative practices aimed at enhancing their efficacy in delivering better health outcomes alongside cost-efficiency improvements across various settings worldwide..

Evaluating Volume Based Payment Models - customer

  1. contract
  2. space
  3. environmentalism
As we continue exploring new frontiers like AI-driven analytics or blockchain-enabled transparency mechanisms alongside embracing collaborative approaches integrating digital solutions such as telemedicine platforms into daily operations; stakeholders stand poised ready adaptively evolve these longstanding frameworks towards becoming truly transformative forces positively impacting global public health landscape ahead!

Utility trailer with a folded loading ramp
A boat on a single-axle trailer

A trailer is an unpowered vehicle towed by a powered vehicle. It is commonly used for the transport of goods and materials.

Sometimes recreational vehicles, travel trailers, or mobile homes with limited living facilities where people can camp or stay have been referred to as trailers. In earlier days, many such vehicles were towable trailers.

Alexander Winston is widely credited for inventing the trailer in Cleveland, Ohio.[1]

United States

[edit]

In the United States, the term is sometimes used interchangeably with travel trailer and mobile home, varieties of trailers, and manufactured housing designed for human habitation. Their origins lay in utility trailers built in a similar fashion to horse-drawn wagons. A trailer park is an area where mobile homes are placed for habitation.

In the United States trailers ranging in size from single-axle dollies to 6-axle, 13-foot-6-inch-high (4.1 m), 53-foot-long (16.2 m) semi-trailers are commonplace. The latter, when towed as part of a tractor-trailer or "18-wheeler", carries a large percentage of the freight that travels over land in North America.

Types

[edit]
ACP Backtracking genset trailer

Some trailers are made for personal (or small business) use with practically any powered vehicle having an appropriate hitch, but some trailers are part of large trucks called semi-trailer trucks for transportation of cargo.

Enclosed toy trailers and motorcycle trailers can be towed by commonly accessible pickup truck or van, which generally require no special permit beyond a regular driver's license. Specialized trailers like open-air motorcycle trailers, bicycle trailers are much smaller, accessible to small automobiles, as are some simple trailers, have a drawbar and ride on a single axle. Other trailers, such as utility trailers and travel trailers or campers come in single and multiple axle varieties, to allow for varying sizes of tow vehicles.

There also exist highly specialized trailers, such as genset trailers, pusher trailers and other types that are also used to power the towing vehicle. Others are custom-built to hold entire kitchens and other specialized equipment used by carnival vendors. There are also trailers for hauling boats.

Trackless train

[edit]
Touristic road train in Nantes, France. It has three trailers.
Main article: Trackless train

Utility

[edit]
See also: Off-road trailer

A utility trailer is a general purpose trailer designed to by towed by a light vehicle and to carry light, compact loads of up to a few metric tonnes. It typically has short metal sides (either rigid or folding) to constrain the load, and may have cage sides, and a rear folding gate or ramps. Utility trailers do not have a roof. Utility trailers have one axle set comprising one, two or three axles. If it does not have sides then it is usually called a flatbed or flat-deck trailer. If it has rails rather than sides, with ramps at the rear, it is usually called an open car transporter, auto-transporter, or a plant trailer, as they are designed to transport vehicles and mobile plant. If it has fully rigid sides and a roof with a rear door, creating a weatherproof compartment, this is usually called a furniture trailer, cargo trailer, box van trailer or box trailer.

Fixed Plant

[edit]
Towable EMSA Generator of Modiin Municipality

A Fixed Plant Trailer is a special purpose trailer built to carry units which usually are immobile such as large generators & pumps

Bicycle

[edit]
Main article: Bicycle trailer
Bicycle trailer of Japan

A bicycle trailer is a motor less wheeled frame with a hitch system for transporting cargo by bicycle.[2]

Construction

[edit]
Main article: Construction trailer
Construction trailer

Toilets are usually provided separately.[3]

Construction trailers are mobile structures (trailers) used to accommodate temporary offices, dining facilities and storage of building materials during construction projects. The trailers are equipped with radios for communication.

Travel

[edit]
Main article: Travel trailer
A custom-made popup camper trailer

Popular campers use lightweight trailers, aerodynamic trailers that can be towed by a small car, such as the BMW Air Camper. They are built to be lower than the tow vehicle, minimizing drag.

Others range from two-axle campers that can be pulled by most mid-sized pickups to trailers that are as long as the host country's law allows for drivers without special permits. Larger campers tend to be fully integrated recreational vehicles, which often are used to tow single-axle dolly trailers to allow the users to bring small cars on their travels.

Teardrop

[edit]
Main article: Teardrop trailer

Semi

[edit]
Main articles: Semi-trailer and Semi-trailer truck

A semi-trailer is a trailer without a front axle. A large proportion of its weight is supported either by a road tractor or by a detachable front axle assembly known as a dolly. A semi-trailer is normally equipped with legs, called "landing gear", which can be lowered to support it when it is uncoupled. In the United States, a single trailer cannot exceed a length of 57 ft 0 in (17.37 m) on interstate highways (unless a special permit is granted), although it is possible to link two smaller trailers together to a maximum length of 63 ft 0 in (19.20 m).

Semi-trailers vary considerably in design, ranging from open-topped grain haulers through Tautliners to normal-looking but refrigerated 13 ft 6 in (4.11 m) x 53 ft 0 in (16.15 m) enclosures ("reefers"). Many semi-trailers are part of semi-trailer trucks. Other types of semi-trailers include dry vans, flatbeds and chassis.

Many commercial organizations choose to rent or lease semi-trailer equipment rather than own their own semi-trailers, to free up capital and to keep trailer debt from appearing on their balance sheet.

  • Semi tank trailer in Japan
    Semi tank trailer in Japan
  • SinoTruk HOWO with flatbed trailer
    SinoTruk HOWO with flatbed trailer
  • LKW Kipper dump trailer
    LKW Kipper dump trailer
  • Sainsburys lorry refrigerated trailer
    Sainsburys lorry refrigerated trailer
  • A car carrier trailer
    A car carrier trailer
  • A truck pulling a semi-trailer using a trailer Dolly
    A truck pulling a semi-trailer using a trailer Dolly
  • Indian auto-rickshaw adapted with trailer
    Indian auto-rickshaw adapted with trailer

Full

[edit]
Full trailer with steered axle

A full trailer is a term used in the United States and New Zealand[4] for a freight trailer supported by front and rear axles and pulled by a drawbar. In Europe this is known as an A-frame drawbar trailer, and in Australia it is known as a dog trailer. Commercial freight trailers are produced to length and width specifications defined by the country of operation. In America this is 96 or 102 in (2.4 or 2.6 m) wide and 35 or 40 ft (11 or 12 m) long. In New Zealand, the maximum width is 2.55 m (100 in) while the maximum length is 11.5 m (38 ft), giving a 22-pallet capacity.

As per AIS 053, full trailer is a towed vehicle having at least two axles, and equipped with a towing device which can move vertically in relation to the trailer and controls the direction of the front axle(s), but which transmits no significant static load to the towing vehicle. Common types of full trailers are flat deck, hardside/box, curtainside or bathtub tipper style with axle configurations up to two at the drawbar end and three at the rear of the trailer.

This style of trailer is also popular for use with farm tractors.

 

Close-coupled

[edit]
A close-coupled trailer

A close-coupled trailer is fitted with a rigid towbar which projects from its front and hooks onto a hook on the tractor. It does not pivot as a drawbar does.

Motorcycle

[edit]
Main article: Motorcycle trailer
Interior of an enclosed motorcycle trailer

A motorcycle trailer may be a trailer designed to haul motorcycles behind an automobile or truck. Such trailers may be open or enclosed, ranging in size from trailers capable of carrying several motorcycles or only one. They may be designed specifically to carry motorcycles, with ramps and tie-downs, or may be a utility trailer adapted permanently or occasionally to haul one or more motorcycles.

Another type of motorcycle trailer is a wheeled frame with a hitch system designed for transporting cargo by motorcycle. Motorcycle trailers are often narrow and styled to match the appearance of the motorcycle they are intended to be towed behind. There are two-wheeled versions and single-wheeled versions. Single-wheeled trailers, such as the Unigo or Pav 40/41, are designed to allow the bike to have all the normal flexibility of a motorcycle, usually using a universal joint to enable the trailer to lean and turn with the motorcycle. No motorcycle manufacturer recommends that its motorcycles be used to tow a trailer because it results in additional safety hazards for motorcyclists.

 

Livestock

[edit]

 

See also: Horse trailer
A horse trailer

There are a number of different styles of trailers used to haul livestock such as cattle, horses, sheep and pigs. The most common is the stock trailer, a trailer that is enclosed on the bottom, but has openings at approximately the eye level of the animals to allow ventilation. The horse trailer is a more elaborate form of stock trailer. Because horses are usually hauled for the purpose of competition or work, where they must be in peak physical condition, horse trailers are designed for the comfort and safety of the animals. They usually have adjustable vents and windows as well as suspension designed to provide a smooth ride and less stress on the animals. In addition, horse trailers have internal partitions that assist the animal in staying upright during travel and protect horses from injuring each other in transit. Larger horse trailers may incorporate additional storage areas for horse tack and may even include elaborate living quarters with sleeping areas, bathroom and cooking facilities, and other comforts.

Lowe Boats Sea Nymph recreational fishing boat on a boat trailer

Both stock trailers and horse trailers range in size from small units capable of holding one to three animals, able to be pulled by a pickup truck, SUV or even a quad bike; to large semi-trailers that can haul a significant number of animals.

Boat

[edit]
Main article: Boat trailer

Roll trailer

[edit]
Maritime shipping Mafi Roll trailer
Main article: Roll trailer

Baggage trailer

[edit]
Main article: airport dolly
A single trailer for an aircraft cargo unit load device, next to a group of trailers for loose luggage

Baggage trailers are used for the transportation of loose baggage, oversized bags, mail bags, loose cargo carton boxes, etc. between the aircraft and the terminal or sorting facility. Dollies for loose baggage are fitted with a brake system which blocks the wheels from moving when the connecting rod is not attached to a tug. Most dollies for loose baggage are completely enclosed except for the sides which use plastic curtains to protect items from weather. In the US, these dollies are called baggage carts, but in Europe baggage cart means passenger baggage trolleys.

 
Mammoet Tii Hydraulic modular trailer attached to a Mercedes ballast tractor moving front end loader

Hydraulic modular trailer

[edit]
Main article: Hydraulic modular trailer

A hydraulic modular trailer (HMT) is a special platform trailer unit which feature swing axles, hydraulic suspension, independently steerable axles, two or more axle rows, compatible to join two or more units longitudinally and laterally and uses power pack unit (PPU) to steer and adjust height. These trailer units are used to transport oversized load, which are difficult to disassemble and are overweight. These trailers are manufactured using high tensile steel, which makes it  possible to bear the weight of the load with the help of one or more ballast tractors which push and pull these units via drawbar or gooseneck together making a heavy hauler unit.

Typical loads include oil rig modules, bridge sections, buildings, ship sections, and industrial machinery such as generators and turbines. There is a limited number of manufacturers who produce these heavy-duty trailers because the market share of oversized loads is very thin when we talk about transportation industry. There are self powered units of hydraulic modular trailer which are called SPMT which are used when the ballast tractors can not be applied.

Bus trailer

[edit]
Main article: Trailer bus

A bus trailer is for transporting passengers hauled by a tractor unit similar like that of a truck. These trailers have become obsolete due to the issue of the communication between the driver and the conductor and traffic jams.[citation needed]

  • Camel bus in Havana
    Camel bus in Havana
  • Karosa NO 80 trailer bus
    Karosa NO 80 trailer bus
  • Bus trailer in Lauterbrunnen
    Bus trailer in Lauterbrunnen

Hitching

[edit]
Main articles: Tow hitch, Fifth wheel coupling, and Ringfeder
Trailer-hitch on a large vehicle

A trailer hitch, fifth-wheel coupling or other type of tow hitch is needed to draw a trailer with a car, truck or other traction engine.

Ball and socket

[edit]

A trailer coupler is used to secure the trailer to the towing vehicle. The trailer coupler attaches to the trailer ball. This forms a ball and socket connection to allow for relative movement between the towing vehicle and trailer while towing over uneven road surfaces. The trailer ball is mounted to the rear bumper or to a draw bar, which may be removable. The draw bar is secured to the trailer hitch by inserting it into the hitch receiver and pinning it. The three most common types of couplers are straight couplers, A-frame couplers, and adjustable couplers. Bumper-pull hitches and draw bars can exert tremendous leverage on the tow vehicle making it harder to recover from a swerving situation.

Fifth wheel and gooseneck

[edit]

 

A gooseneck trailer attached to a pickup truck
Gooseneck trailer

These are available for loads between 10,000 and 30,000 pounds (4.5–13.6 t; 5.0–15.0 short tons; 4.5–13.4 long tons).[5][6] Both the hitches are better than a receiver hitch and allow a more efficient and central attachment of a large trailer to the tow vehicle. They can haul large loads without disrupting the stability of the vehicle. Traditional hitches are connected to the rear of the vehicle at the frame or bumper, while fifth wheel and gooseneck trailers are attached to the truck bed above the rear axle. This coupling location allows the truck to make sharper turns and haul heavier trailers. They can be mounted in the bed of a pickup truck or any type of flatbed. A fifth-wheel coupling is also referred to as a kingpin hitch and is a smaller version of the semi-trailer "fifth wheel". Though a fifth wheel and a gooseneck trailer look much the same, their method for coupling is different. A fifth wheel uses a large horseshoe-shaped coupling device mounted 1 foot (0.30 m) or more above the bed of the tow vehicle. A gooseneck couples to a standard 2+5⁄16-inch (59 mm) ball mounted on the bed of the tow vehicle. The operational difference between the two is the range of movement in the hitch. The gooseneck is very maneuverable and can tilt in all directions, while the fifth wheel is intended for level roads and limited tilt side to side. Gooseneck mounts are often used for agricultural and industrial trailers. Fifth-wheel mounts are often used for recreational trailers. Standard bumper-hitch trailers typically allow a 10% or 15% hitch load while a fifth wheel and gooseneck can handle 20% or 25% weight transfer.

Jacks

[edit]

The basic function of a trailer jack is to lift the trailer to a height that allows the trailer to be hitched or unhitched to and from the towing vehicle. Trailer jacks are also used for leveling the trailer during storage. The most common types of trailer jacks are A-frame jacks, swivel jacks, and drop-leg jacks. Some trailers, such as horse trailers, have a built-in jack at the tongue for this purpose.

Electrical components

[edit]

Many older cars took the feeds for the trailer's lights directly from the towing vehicle's rear light circuits. As bulb-check systems were introduced in the 1990s "by-pass relays" were introduced. These took a small signal from the rear lights to switch a relay which in turn powered the trailer's lights with its own power feed. Many towing electrical installations, including vehicle-specific kits incorporate some form of bypass relays.

In the US, trailer lights usually have a shared light for brake and turn indicators. If such a trailer is to be connected to a car with separate lamps for turn indicator and brake a trailer light converter is needed, which allows for attaching the trailer's lights to the wiring of the vehicle.

Nowadays some vehicles are being fitted with CANbus networks, and some of these use the CANbus to connect the tow bar electrics to various safety systems and controls. For vehicles that use the CANbus to activate towing-related safety systems, a wiring kit that can interact appropriately must be used. Without such a towbar wiring kit the vehicle cannot detect the presence of a trailer and can therefore not activate safety features such as trailer stability program which can electronically control a snaking trailer or caravan.

By-pass systems are cheap, but may not be appropriate on cars with interactive safety features.

Brakes

[edit]
Bus and trailer in Saskatchewan, Canada

Larger trailers are usually fitted with brakes. These can be either electrically operated, air operated, or overrun brakes.

Stability

[edit]

Trailer stability can be defined as the tendency of a trailer to dissipate side-to-side motion. The initial motion may be caused by aerodynamic forces, such as from a cross wind or a passing vehicle. One common criterion for stability is the center of mass location with respect to the wheels, which can usually be detected by tongue weight. If the center of mass of the trailer is behind its wheels, therefore having a negative tongue weight, the trailer will likely be unstable. Another parameter which is less commonly a factor is the trailer moment of inertia. Even if the center of mass is forward of the wheels, a trailer with a long load, and thus large moment of inertia, may be unstable.[7]

Some vehicles are equipped with a Trailer Stability Program that may be able to compensate for improper loading.

See also

[edit]
  • Electric vehicle battery
  • Towing
  • Tractor unit
  • Trailer brake controller
  • Vehicle category
  • Walking floor

List of types of trailers

[edit]
  • Bicycle trailer
  • Boat trailer
  • Bus trailer
  • Compressed hydrogen tube trailer
  • Construction trailer
  • Dolly
  • Dump trailer
  • Enclosed cargo trailer
  • Flat deck trailer
  • Frac Tank
  • Forestry trailer
  • Genset trailer
  • Horse trailer
  • Hydraulic modular trailer
  • Jeep trailer
  • Liquid hydrogen trailer
  • Lowboy (trailer)
  • Mafi roll trailer
  • Mobile home
  • Motorcycle trailer
  • Popup camper
  • Pusher trailer
  • Roll trailer
  • Semi-trailer
  • Solar trailer (for solar vehicles)
  • Tautliner
  • Tank trailer
  • Travel trailer
  • Food truck
  • Mobile catering

References

[edit]
  1. ^ boxwheeladmin (2020-06-17). "Interesting Facts About Semi Trailers and Their History". Boxwheel Trailer Leasing. Retrieved 2024-07-02.
  2. ^ Cycles. Cycle trailers. Safety requirements and test methods, BSI British Standards, retrieved 2024-09-20
  3. ^ "Construction trailer Definition".
  4. ^ "What is a full trailer". Driving Tests Resources. 19 July 2021.
  5. ^ "Gooseneck Trailer Hitch Information and Review | etrailer.com". www.etrailer.com. Retrieved 2017-07-22.
  6. ^ "How To Install Gooseneck Hitches". www.hitchesguide.com. Archived from the original on 15 April 2016. Retrieved 2017-07-22.cite web: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  7. ^ Karnopp, Dean (2004). Vehicle Stability. CRC Press. p. 93. ISBN 9780203913567. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Trailer.
 
Look up trailer in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

 

 

A sewage treatment plant that uses solar energy, located at Santuari de Lluc monastery in Spain.
Environmentally friendly speed warning powered by solar and wind power.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Earth seen from Apollo 17
Environment
  • Human impact
    • on the climate
  • Issues
  • Environmentalism
    • Stewardship
  • Environmental studies
Environment in
  • Consulting
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Humanities
  • Law
  • Policy
  • Science
  • Social science
  • Article index
  • Lists
  • Portal
  • Category
  • Commons
 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Part of a series on
Green politics
Sunflower symbol
Core topics
  • Climate change litigation
  • Fossil fuels lobby
  • Green politics
  • Green party
  • List of topics
  • Politics of climate change
Four pillars
  • Ecological wisdom
  • Social justice
  • Grassroots democracy
  • Nonviolence
Perspectives
  • Alter-globalization
  • Bright green environmentalism
  • Criticisms of globalization
  • Deep ecology
  • Degrowth
  • Dirty hands
  • Disinvestment
  • Ecoauthoritarianism
  • Eco-capitalism
  • Ecocentrism
  • Ecofascism
  • Ecofeminism
  • Eco-nationalism
  • Eco-socialism
  • Environmentalism
  • Green anarchism
  • Green conservatism
  • Green left
  • Green liberalism
  • Green libertarianism
  • Green Zionism
  • Social ecology
  • Queer ecology
Organizations
  • Asia Pacific Greens Federation
  • European Green Party
  • Federation of Green Parties of Africa
  • Federation of the Green Parties of the Americas
  • Federation of Young European Greens
  • Global Greens
  • Global Young Greens
  • World Ecological Parties
Related topics
  • Carbon fee and dividend
  • Carbon tax
  • Circular economy
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Climate finance
  • Climate justice
  • Climate target
  • Conservation movement
  • Corporate political activism
  • Eco-investing
  • Ecological economics
  • Ecological modernization
  • Ecomodernism
  • Eco-tariff
  • Ecotax
  • Eco-terrorism
  • Environmental
    • conflict
    • effects of agriculture
    • effects of aviation
    • finance
    • issues
    • justice
    • movement
    • planning
    • pricing reform
    • racism
    • technology
  • Environmentalism
    • opposition
      • Environmental skepticism
    • Stewardship
    • in music
  • Fossil fuel phase-out
  • Green
    • development
    • economy
    • growth
    • grabbing
    • greening
    • imperialism
    • industrial policy
    • infrastructure
    • job
    • New Deal
    • recovery
    • retrofit
    • state
    • theory
    • transport hierarchy
    • vehicle
    • washing
  • Localism
  • Low-carbon economy
  • List of environmental incidents
    • conflicts
    • killings
  • Political ecology
  • Progressivism
  • Renewable energy
  • Sustainable
    • design
    • development
    • energy
    • engineering
    • refurbishment
    • transport
  • War on coal
  • Water conflict
 

Environment friendly processes, or environmental-friendly processes (also referred to as eco-friendly, nature-friendly, and green), are sustainability and marketing terms referring to goods and services, laws, guidelines and policies that claim reduced, minimal, or no harm upon ecosystems or the environment.[1]

Companies use these ambiguous terms to promote goods and services, sometimes with additional, more specific certifications, such as ecolabels. Their overuse can be referred to as greenwashing.[2][3][4] To ensure the successful meeting of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) companies are advised to employ environmental friendly processes in their production.[5] Specifically, Sustainable Development Goal 12 measures 11 targets and 13 indicators "to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns".[6]

The International Organization for Standardization has developed ISO 14020 and ISO 14024 to establish principles and procedures for environmental labels and declarations that certifiers and eco-labellers should follow. In particular, these standards relate to the avoidance of financial conflicts of interest, the use of sound scientific methods and accepted test procedures, and openness and transparency in the setting of standards.[7]

Regional variants

[edit]

Europe

[edit]

Products located in members of the European Union can use the EU Ecolabel pending the EU's approval.[8] EMAS is another EU label[9][10] that signifies whether an organization management is green as opposed to the product.[11] Germany also uses the Blue Angel, based on Germany's standard.[12][13]

In Europe, there are many different ways that companies are using environmentally friendly processes, eco-friendly labels, and overall changing guidelines to ensure that there is less harm being done to the environment and ecosystems while their products are being made. In Europe, for example, many companies are already using EMAS[citation needed] labels to show that their products are friendly.[14]

Companies

[edit]

Many companies in Europe make putting eco-labels on their products a top-priority since it can result to an increase in sales when there are eco-labels on these products. In Europe specifically, a study was conducted that shows a connection between eco-labels and the purchasing of fish: "Our results show a significant connection between the desire for eco-labeling and seafood features, especially the freshness of the fish, the geographical origin of the fish and the wild vs farmed origin of the fish".[15] This article shows that eco-labels are not only reflecting a positive impact on the environment when it comes to creating and preserving products, but also increase sales. However, not all European countries agree on whether certain products, especially fish, should have eco-labels. In the same article, it is remarked: "Surprisingly, the country effect on the probability of accepting a fish eco-label is tricky to interpret. The countries with the highest level of eco-labeling acceptability are Belgium and France".[16] According to the same analysis and statistics, France and Belgium are most likely of accepting these eco-labels.

North America

[edit]

In the United States, environmental marketing claims require caution. Ambiguous titles such as environmentally friendly can be confusing without a specific definition; some regulators are providing guidance.[17] The United States Environmental Protection Agency has deemed some ecolabels misleading in determining whether a product is truly "green".[18]

In Canada, one label is that of the Environmental Choice Program.[12] Created in 1988,[19] only products approved by the program are allowed to display the label.[20]

Overall, Mexico was one of the first countries in the world to pass a specific law on climate change. The law set an obligatory target of reducing national greenhouse-gas emissions by 30% by 2020. The country also has a National Climate Change Strategy, which is intended to guide policymaking over the next 40 years.[21]

Oceania

[edit]

The Energy Rating Label is a Type III label[22][23] that provides information on "energy service per unit of energy consumption".[24] It was first created in 1986, but negotiations led to a redesign in 2000.[25]

Oceania generates the second most e-waste, 16.1 kg, while having the third lowest recycling rate of 8.8%.[26] Out of Oceania, only Australia has a policy in policy to manage e-waste, that being the Policy Stewardship Act published in 2011 that aimed to manage the impact of products, mainly those in reference to the disposal of products and their waste.[27] Under the Act the National Television and Computer Recycling Scheme (NTCRS) was created, which forced manufactures and importers of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) importing 5000 or more products or 15000 or more peripherals be liable and required to pay the NTCRS for retrieving and recycling materials from electronic products.

New Zealand does not have any law that directly manages their e-waste, instead they have voluntary product stewardship schemes such as supplier trade back and trade-in schemes and voluntary recycling drop-off points. Though this has helped it costs the provider money with labor taking up 90% of the cost of recycling. In addition, e-waste is currently not considered a priority product, which would encourage the enforcement of product stewardship. In Pacific Island Regions (PIR), e-waste management is a hard task since they lack the adequate amount of land to properly dispose of it even though they produce one of the lowest amounts of e-waste in the world due to their income and population. Due to this there are large stockpiles of waste unable to be recycled safely.

Currently, The Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), an organization in charge of managing the natural resources and environment of the Pacific region, is in charge of region coordination and managing the e-waste of the Oceania region.[28] SPREP uses Cleaner Pacific 2025 as a framework to guide the various governments in the region.[29] They also work with PacWaste (Pacific Hazardous Waste) to identify and resolve the different issues with waste management of the islands, which largely stem from the lack of government enforcement and knowledge on the matter.[30] They have currently proposed a mandatory product stewardship policy be put in place along with an advance recycling fee which would incentivize local and industrial recycling. They are also in the mindset that the islands should collaborate and share resources and experience to assist in the endeavor.

With the help from the NTCRS, though the situation has improved they have been vocal about the responsibilities of stakeholders in the situation and how they need to be more clearly defined. In addition to there being a differences in state and federal regulations, with only Southern Australia, Australian Capital Territory, and Victoria having banned e-waste landfill, it would be possible to make this apply the rest of the region if a federal decision was made. They have also advocated for reasonable access to collection points for waste, with there being only one collection point within a 100 km radius in some cases. It has been shown that the reason some residents do not recycle is because of their distance from a collection point. In addition, there have been few campaigns to recycle, with the company, Mobile Muster, a voluntary collection program managed by the Australian Mobile Telecommunication Association, aimed to collect phones before they went to a landfill and has been doing so since 1999. Upon further study, it was found that only 46% of the public was award of the program, which later increased to 74% in 2018, but this was after an investment of $45 million from the Australian Mobile Telecommunication Association.

Asia

[edit]

"Economic growth in Asia has increased in the past three decades and has heightened energy demand, resulting in rising greenhouse gas emissions and severe air pollution. To tackle these issues, fuel switching and the deployment of renewables are essential."[31] However, as countries continue to advance, it leads to more pollution as a result of increased energy consumption. In recent years, the biggest concern for Asia is its air pollution issues. Major Chinese cities such as Beijing have received the worst air quality rankings (Li et al., 2017). Seoul, the capital of South Korea, also suffers from air pollution (Kim et al., 2017). Currently, Indian cities such as Mumbai and Delhi are overtaking Chinese cities in the ranking of worst air quality. In 2019, 21 of the world's 30 cities with the worst air quality were in India."

The environmentally friendly trends are marketed with a different color association, using the color blue for clean air and clean water, as opposed to green in western cultures. Japanese- and Korean-built hybrid vehicles use the color blue instead of green all throughout the vehicle, and use the word "blue" indiscriminately.[32]

 

China

[edit]

According to Shen, Li, Wang, and Liao, the emission trading system that China had used for its environmentally friendly journey was implemented in certain districts and was successful in comparison to those which were used in test districts that were approved by the government.[33] This shows how China tried to effectively introduce new innovative systems to impact the environment. China implemented multiple ways to combat environmental problems even if they didn't succeed at first. It led to them implementing a more successful process which benefited the environment. Although China needs to implement policies like, "The “fee-to-tax” process should be accelerated, however, and the design and implementation of the environmental tax system should be improved. This would form a positive incentive mechanism in which a low level of pollution correlates with a low level of tax." By implementing policies like these companies have a higher incentive to not over pollute the environment and instead focus on creating an eco-friendlier environment for their workplaces. In doing so, it will lead to less pollution being emitted while there also being a cleaner environment. Companies would prefer to have lower taxes to lessen the costs they have to deal with, so it encourages them to avoid polluting the environment as much as possible.

International

[edit]

Energy Star is a program with a primary goal of increasing energy efficiency and indirectly decreasing greenhouse gas emissions.[34] Energy Star has different sections for different nations or areas, including the United States,[35] the European Union[36] and Australia.[37] The program, which was founded in the United States, also exists in Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and Taiwan.[38] Additionally, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 17 has a target to promote the development, transfer, dissemination, and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies to developing countries as part of the 2030 Agenda.[39]

See also

[edit]
  • Climate justice
  • Cradle-to-cradle design
  • Design for Environment
  • Ecolabel
  • Environmental Choice Program
  • Environmental enterprise
  • Environmental movement
  • Environmental organizations
  • Environmental protection
  • Environmentalism
  • Green brands
  • Green trading
  • Greenwashing
  • List of environmental issues
  • List of environmental organizations
  • List of environmental topics
  • Market-based instruments
  • Natural capital
  • Natural resource
  • Renewable energy
  • Sustainability
    • Sustainable products
    • Corporate sustainability

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "nature-friendly". Webster's New Millennium Dictionary of English, Preview Edition (v 0.9.7). Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.
  2. ^ Motavalli, Jim (12 February 2011). "A History of Greenwashing: How Dirty Towels Impacted the Green Movement". AOL.
  3. ^ "Grønvaskere invaderer børsen" [Greenwashers invade the market]. EPN.dk (in Danish). Jyllands-Posten. 21 June 2008. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 22 December 2012.
  4. ^ Greenwashing Fact Sheet. 22 March 2001. Retrieved 14 November 2009. from corpwatch.org Archived 7 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ "Eco friendly production key to achieving sdgs".
  6. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  7. ^ "international standards for eco-labeling". Green Seal. Archived from the original on 28 November 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
  8. ^ "Welcome to the European Union Eco-label Homepage". EUROPA. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  9. ^ "EMAS". EUROPA. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  10. ^ "Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)". Green Business. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  11. ^ "Minutes" (PDF). EUEB Coordination and Cooperation Management Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 February 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  12. ^ a b "Environmental Labels Type I". Ricoh. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  13. ^ Freimann, Jurgen; Schwedes, Roswitha (2000). <99::aid-ema135>3.0.co;2-x "EMAS experiences in German companies: a survey on empirical studies". Eco-Management and Auditing. 7 (3): 99–105. doi:10.1002/1099-0925(200009)7:3<99::aid-ema135>3.0.co;2-x. ISSN 0968-9427.
  14. ^ "EUROPA - Environment - Ecolabel - FAQ". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
  15. ^ Brécard, Dorothée; Hlaimi, Boubaker; Lucas, Sterenn; Perraudeau, Yves; Salladarré, Frédéric (15 November 2009). "Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe". Ecological Economics. The DPSIR framework for Biodiversity Assessment. 69 (1): 115–125. Bibcode:2009EcoEc..69..115B. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.017. ISSN 0921-8009.
  16. ^ Miras Rodríguez, María del Mar; Escobar Pérez, Bernabé; Carrasco Gallego, Amalia (2015). "Are companies less environmentally-friendly due to the crisis? Evidence from Europe". hdl:11441/85190. ISSN 2182-8466. cite journal: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. ^ "Environmental Claims". Federal Trade Commission. 17 November 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2008.
  18. ^ "Labels -environmentally friendly". ecolabels. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  19. ^ "About the Program". EcoLogo. Archived from the original on 27 May 2006. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  20. ^ "Environmental Choice (Canada)". Environment Canada. Archived from the original on 25 November 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  21. ^ Stiftung, Bertelsmann. "SGI 2017 | Mexico | Environmental Policies". www.sgi-network.org. Retrieved 19 February 2021.
  22. ^ "Overview of Regulatory Requirements - Labelling and MEPS". Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 1 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  23. ^ Arnaud Bizard; Brett Lee; Karen Puterrman. "AWARE and Environmental Labeling Programs: One Step Closer to a Sustainable Economy" (PDF). ME 589. Retrieved 10 July 2007. cite journal: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  24. ^ "Overview of how are star ratings calculated?". Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  25. ^ "The Energy Label". Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  26. ^ Van Yken, Jonovan; Boxall, Naomi J.; Cheng, Ka Yu; Nikoloski, Aleksandar N.; Moheimani, Navid R.; Kaksonen, Anna H. (August 2021). "E-Waste Recycling and Resource Recovery: A Review on Technologies, Barriers and Enablers with a Focus on Oceania". Metals. 11 (8): 1313. doi:10.3390/met11081313.
  27. ^ "Review of the Product Stewardship Act 2011" (PDF).
  28. ^ "About Us | Pacific Environment".
  29. ^ "Cleaner Pacific 2025. Pacific Regional Waste and Pollution Management Strategy" (PDF). un.org. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
  30. ^ "What is Pacwaste? | Pacific Environment".
  31. ^ Arimura, Toshi H.; Sugino, Makoto (7 August 2020). "Energy-Related Environmental Policy and Its Impacts on Energy Use in Asia". Asian Economic Policy Review. 16 (1). Wiley: 44–61. doi:10.1111/aepr.12319. ISSN 1832-8105. S2CID 225416259.
  32. ^ "S.Korea unveils 'recharging road' for eco-friendly buses". phys.org. Retrieved 28 May 2021.
  33. ^ Ge, Wenjun; Yang, Derong; Chen, Weineng; Li, Sheng (7 February 2023). "Can Setting Up a Carbon Trading Mechanism Improve Urban Eco-Efficiency? Evidence from China". Sustainability. 15 (4). MDPI AG: 3014. doi:10.3390/su15043014. ISSN 2071-1050.
  34. ^ "About Energy Star". Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  35. ^ "United States Energy Star Home Page". Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  36. ^ "EU Energy Star Home Page". Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  37. ^ "Australia Energy Star Home Page". Energy Star. Archived from the original on 3 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
  38. ^ "Who's Working With ENERGY STAR? International Partners". Energy Star. Retrieved 3 February 2009.
  39. ^ "Goal 17 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
 

 

Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in New Hanover County

Driving Directions From La Guera Authentic Mexican to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Zaxbys Chicken Fingers & Buffalo Wings to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Brooklyn Pizza Co. to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Cape Fear Seafood Company to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Brooklyn+Pizza+Co./The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2625028,-77.8268447,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJM7Fmv6-MqYkRWD4Uxc59g0g!2m2!1d-77.8268447!2d34.2625028!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Ruth%27s+Kitchen/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2592195,-77.8331824,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJGUlh2quMqYkRS6iDlozMVlo!2m2!1d-77.8331824!2d34.2592195!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Two+Guys+Grille/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2979536,-77.7910328,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJKT-fylSMqYkR1THbE9NKWoI!2m2!1d-77.7910328!2d34.2979536!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Pho+Vanhly+Noodle+House/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2988316,-77.7892917,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJ_c-cnVKNqYkRyM8NrtAs6Fk!2m2!1d-77.7892917!2d34.2988316!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

Driving Directions From Poplar Grove Plantation to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Cape Fear Museum of History and Science to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Bluethenthal Wildflower Preserve to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Burgwin-Wright House and Gardens to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Candyland+at+the+Batson%27s/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.1508616,-77.913626,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sunknown!2m2!1d-77.913626!2d34.1508616!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Harbor+Way+Gardens/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.215659,-77.8072427,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sunknown!2m2!1d-77.8072427!2d34.215659!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/The+Children%27s+Museum+of+Wilmington/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2327918,-77.9474781,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sunknown!2m2!1d-77.9474781!2d34.2327918!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Battleship+North+Carolina/The+Dumpo+Junk+Removal+%26+Hauling/@34.2365524,-77.9543704,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sunknown!2m2!1d-77.9543704!2d34.2365524!1m5!1m1!1sChIJx5IXJrSNqYkR-YL-JMS0RK4!2m2!1d-77.8239897!2d34.2723577!3e0

Reviews for

Kelly Vaughn

(5)

Great service with professionalism. You can't ask for more than that!

Greg Wallace

(5)

I highly recommend Dumpo Junk Removal. Very professional with great pricing and quality work.

Kirk Schmidt

(5)

They are great with junk removal. Highly recommend them

Jennifer Davidson

(5)

Great work! Bryce and Adrian are great!

Howard Asberry

(5)

The manager was very helpful, knowledgeable and forthright. He definitely knew what he was talking about and explained everything to me and was very helpful. I'm looking forward to working with him

View GBP

Check our other pages :

Frequently Asked Questions

Volume-based payment models can enhance financial sustainability by incentivizing the processing of larger quantities of e-waste, thereby potentially lowering unit costs through economies of scale. However, they may also pressure companies to prioritize quantity over quality, which could lead to inefficiencies if not managed properly.
These models can encourage the efficient collection and recycling of a greater volume of e-waste, reducing landfill use and promoting resource recovery. However, they may also lead to shortcuts or inadequate treatment processes if facilities strive for higher volumes without ensuring proper handling practices.
Such models typically create stronger incentives for collaboration among stakeholders, including collectors and recyclers, as all parties benefit from increased volumes. Conversely, they might also foster competitive tensions or conflicts regarding pricing and quality standards if one party prioritizes volume excessively over comprehensive service delivery.